2012年7月16日

Re: Duplicate In-Reply-To entries in reply buffer

Thanks David,

I've been fretting a bit about whether the two patches were
compatible, but I guess this means you think that's okay.

Since the changes to source repositories, I've been a little confused
about where to get the latest wanderlust stuff. So how do I get to
this "master @ wanderlust/wanderlust" ?


-Don

At Sun, 15 Jul 2012 11:25:02 -0500,
David Maus wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (7bit)>]
> At Fri, 06 Jul 2012 22:31:50 +0900,
> Kazuhiro Ito wrote:
> >
> > [1 <text/plain; US-ASCII (7bit)>]
> > Hi,
> >
> > > If I use "a" in the Summary buffer it sets up a draft buffer with the
> > > In-Reply-To field already correctly set. But if I then do "C-c C-y" in
> > > the draft buffer, an extry copy of the same message id gets appended
> > > onto the In-Reply-To field.
> > >
> > > It's possible that this has something to do with line wrapping and the
> > > unusual length of message-id's that our email system often
> > > generates.
> >
> > The attached patch would fix handling of folded Message-ID: header.
> > But the patch is little tested (and not at all in some part).
>
> I pushed a modified version of this patch to master @
> wanderlust/wanderlust that also implements a modified version of the
> fix for unfolding message-id suggested in
> <mid:rfwmx62teq6.wl%Don.Bashford@xxxxx>.
>
> Best,
> -- David
> --
> OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
> Jabber.... dmjena@xxxxx
> Email..... dmaus@xxxxx
> [2 <application/pgp-signature (7bit)>]
>

Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer

投稿者 xml-rpc : 2012年7月16日 09:08
役に立ちました?:
過去のフィードバック 平均:(0) 総合:(0) 投票回数:(0)
本記事へのTrackback: http://MLog.euqset.org/blog/mt-tb2006.cgi/110208
トラックバック
コメント
コメントする




画像の中に見える文字を入力してください。